Nomination Guidelines

We invite eligible candidates to participate in the "Computational Biologists Awards" by following these simple nomination steps:

Step 1: Access the Nomination Form

• Eligible candidates can initiate the nomination process by clicking the "Nominate/Submit Your Profile (CV) Now" button on our official nomination page.

Step 2: Complete the Online Submission Form

• Fill out the online submission form with your details and credentials. Ensure that all required fields are accurately completed.

Step 3: Submit Your Nomination

• After completing the form, click the "Submit" button to officially submit your nomination.

Nomination Process Overview:

1. Document Screening:
   • Once nominations are received, our team will review the submitted documents.
2. Acknowledgment:
   • Nominees will receive an acknowledgment email to confirm the successful submission of their nomination.
3. Verification of Credentials:
   • The team may request proof of the credits and achievements mentioned in your CV or nomination form.
4. Review by the Committee:
   • Nomination documents will be cross-verified and forwarded to the award committee for evaluation.
5. Selection Announcement:
   • Selected candidates will be notified via email. Additionally, the list of selected nominees will be accessible on the website under the "Track My Submission" section.
6. Event Registration:
   • Award winners will be invited to register for the event and celebration.
7. Winners Announcement:
   • The official list of award winners will be released on our website.
8. Award Presentation Ceremony:
   • Winners will be honored during an award presentation ceremony.
9. Profile Report Release:
   • A comprehensive profile report of each award winner will be made available.

Thank you for your interest in recognizing and celebrating excellence in the field of Computational Biologists Awards. Your nomination is a valuable contribution to honoring outstanding individuals in the industry.

If you have any questions or require further assistance with the nomination process, please feel free to reach out to us at contact@computationalbiologists.com

Nomination Process

1. Visit the Global Awards Official Website: Start by visiting the official website of the Computational Biologists Awards. You can access the website here: Computational Biologists Awards Website.
2. Navigate to the Nomination Section: Locate the "Nominate Now" section on the home page of the Global Awards website. You can access the nomination page directly using this link: Nomination Page.
3. Provide Your Primary Details:

• Title: Choose your title from the available options (e.g., Dr. Mr. Mrs. etc.).
• First Name: Enter your first name in the provided field.
• Last Name: Enter your last name.
• Category: Select the relevant category from the options provided.
• Designation: Input your current job title or designation.
• Institution/Organization: Specify the name of your company, institution, or organization.
• Country: Choose your country from the provided list.
• Email: Enter your email address.
• Phone: Input your phone number, including WhatsApp if applicable.
• Full Postal Address: If you want to receive a printed brochure, provide your complete postal address.
• Queries & Comments: If you have any inquiries or comments, you can include them here.

4. Provide Subject Details:

• Domain: Choose the domain that aligns with your expertise or the nominee's expertise.
• Subdomain/Subject/Service Area: Enter the specific subdomain or subject area within the chosen domain.

5. Professional Details:

• Upload your Resume (CV) /Filled Application form: Upload the relevant document containing your resume or filled application form. You can download the application.
• Webpage links (optional): If applicable, provide links to your websites, profiles, blogs, videos, or social media pages where your research work is explained.

6. Research Awards: Select the specific award category you wish to be considered for from the available options.
7. CAPTCHA Verification: Complete the CAPTCHA verification process to confirm your status as a human user.
8. Submit Your Nomination: Once all the required fields are completed and any necessary files are uploaded, click the "SUBMIT" button to finalize your nomination.
9. Confirmation: Upon submission, you may receive a confirmation message or email acknowledging the receipt of your nomination.

Eligibility Criteria for Computational Biologists Awards

Last Updated: January  01, 2024

1. Award Categories Each award category may have specific eligibility requirements. Nominees must review and meet the criteria specified for their chosen category.
2. Individual Eligibility Individual nominees must be professionals, researchers, innovators, or contributors actively engaged in the field of  Computational Biologists Awards.
3. Organization Eligibility Organizations, institutions, companies, or research groups nominated for awards must have a significant presence and contribution in the field of  Computational Biologists Awards.
4. Nomination Process Nominations must be submitted through the official nomination platform provided. Self-nominations are allowed. Organizations may nominate themselves or be nominated by third parties.
5. Publication-Based Awards For awards based on publications, the nominated publications must have been published within a specified time frame, typically within the last [number] years. Publications must be relevant to the field of Computational Biologists Awards.
6. Compliance with Rules and Regulations Nominees must comply with all rules and regulations governing the award nomination process. Any violation of these rules may lead to disqualification.
7. Multiple Nominations Nominees may submit nominations in multiple award categories if they meet the eligibility criteria for each category.
8. Conflict of Interest Judges and evaluators involved in the selection process must declare any potential conflicts of interest with nominees or their organizations. Steps will be taken to ensure unbiased evaluations.
9. Transparency Nominees must provide accurate and truthful information during the nomination process. Any attempt to provide false or misleading information may result in disqualification.
10. Communication Nominees should provide valid contact information for communication purposes. All communication regarding the award nomination process will be sent to the provided contact details.
11. Award Ceremony Attendance Award winners may be invited to attend the award ceremony or event to receive their recognition. Nominees should be willing and able to attend if selected as winners.
12. Verification Nominees may be required to provide additional documentation or evidence to verify their eligibility or the authenticity of their contributions.
13. Disqualification The organizing committee reserves the right to disqualify any nomination that does not comply with these eligibility criteria or the submission guidelines.

Terms & Conditions for Award Nomination

Last Updated: January 01, 2024

By participating in the Award Nomination process, you agree to the following Terms & Conditions. Please read them carefully:

1. Eligibility

• Nominees must meet the eligibility criteria specified for each award category.
• The award nomination process is open to individuals and organizations worldwide.

2. Nomination Process

• All award nominations must be submitted through the official nomination platform provided.
• Nominees are responsible for providing accurate and authentic information in their nominations.

3. Submission Requirements

• Nominees must adhere to the submission guidelines and requirements specified for each award category.
• Incomplete or incorrectly submitted nominations may be disqualified.

4. Evaluation Process

• Award nominations will be evaluated by a panel of experts in the field, based on the criteria outlined for each award category.
• The decision of the evaluation panel is final and binding.

5. Privacy

• The personal information collected during the award nomination process will be used solely for the purpose of processing nominations and communicating with nominees.
• For more details, please refer to our Privacy Policy.

6. Announcement of Winners

• The announcement of award winners will be made on our official website within the specified time frame.
• Winners will also be notified via email or other contact information provided during the nomination process.

7. Awards Ceremony

• Winners may be invited to participate in an awards ceremony or event to receive their recognition.

8. Award Usage

• Award winners are encouraged to use their recognition for promotional and professional purposes, with appropriate acknowledgment.

9. Changes to Terms & Conditions

• We reserve the right to make changes or updates to these Terms & Conditions as necessary.
• Any changes will be communicated to nominees through the official website or other means.

10. Disqualification

• We reserve the right to disqualify nominations that do not comply with the Terms & Conditions or submission guidelines.

11. Liability

• We are not liable for any errors or inaccuracies in the award nomination process.
• We are not responsible for any technical issues or disruptions that may affect the submission process.

12. Contact Information

• For inquiries or assistance related to award nominations, please contact us at
• contact@computationalbiologists.com

By participating in the award nomination process, you agree to abide by these Terms & Conditions. Failure to comply with these terms may result in the disqualification of your nomination.

Privacy Policy for Award Nomination

Last Updated: January 01, 2024

1. Information Collection

We collect the following information during the award nomination process:

• Personal Information: This includes your name, email address, affiliation, contact details, and any additional information required for nomination.
• Submission Data: Information related to your award nomination, including the content of your submission and any supporting materials.
• Usage Information: We may collect data about your interactions with our nomination platform, including IP addresses and device information.

2. Use of Information

We use the information you provide during award nomination for the following purposes:

• To process your award nomination and communicate with you regarding your submission.
• To send updates and notifications related to the award nomination process.
• To evaluate award nominations and select winners.
• To improve and analyze our award nomination platform.

3. Data Sharing and Disclosure

We do not share your personal information with third parties, except for the purposes of managing the award nomination process.

4. Data Security

We take reasonable measures to safeguard your personal information from unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration, or destruction.

5. Your Choices

You have the right to:

• Review and update your personal information.
• Opt-out of receiving award-related communications.
• Request the deletion of your personal information, subject to legal requirements.

6. Cookies and Tracking Technologies

We may use cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience on our award nomination platform. You can manage cookie preferences through your browser settings.

7. Changes to This Privacy Policy

We may update this Privacy Policy as necessary. Any significant changes will be communicated to you.

8. Contact Information

If you have questions or concerns about your privacy or this Privacy Policy, please contact us at

• contact@computationalbiologists.com

9. Terms & Conditions

Please note that by participating in the award nomination process, you agree to our Terms & Conditions. To review our Terms & Conditions, please visit website.

10. Responsibility

Delegates are personally responsible for the accuracy and authenticity of the information provided during the award nomination process.

11. Disclaimer

All award nominations are subject to review and evaluation. Nominees are responsible for the accuracy and authenticity of their submissions.

Publication-Based Awards Explanation:

Publication-based awards are a category of recognition within the " Computational Biologists Awards" that specifically acknowledge and honor outstanding contributions to the field made through published research, papers, or publications. These awards are designed to celebrate the significant impact of scholarly work and its contribution to the advancement of Computational Biologists Awards.

Key Components of Publication-Based Awards:

1. Eligibility Criteria:
   • To be eligible for publication-based awards, nominees must have authored or co-authored research papers, articles, or publications related to Computational Biologists Awards.
   • The publications must be relevant to the field and have been published within a specific time frame, typically within the last [number] years.
2. Nomination Process:
   • Nominees or their peers can submit publications for consideration in this award category.
   • The nomination process may require submitting the publication title, authors, publication date, and a brief summary of the research's significance and impact.
3. Evaluation Process:
   • A panel of expert judges or evaluators with expertise in Computational Biologists Awards will review the nominated publications.
   • The evaluation process considers factors such as the quality of research, innovation, impact on the field, and contribution to solving real-world problems.
4. Recognition and Awards:
   • Publications that meet the criteria and are selected by the judging panel may receive awards or recognition during the award ceremony.
   • Winning publications are typically acknowledged for their excellence and impact on the field.
5. Benefits of Publication-Based Awards:
   • Recognition: Winners of publication-based awards gain recognition and credibility in the academic and research communities.
   • Networking: Award ceremonies and events provide opportunities for networking and collaboration with peers.
   • Career Advancement: Such awards can enhance the professional reputation of researchers and open up new career opportunities.
6. Promotion of Research:
   • Publication-based awards encourage researchers and scholars to publish high-quality work and contribute to the dissemination of knowledge in the field.
   • They promote excellence in research and innovation in Computational Biologists Awards.
7. Transparency and Fairness:
   • The selection process for publication-based awards is typically transparent and conducted by a panel of experts, ensuring fairness and impartiality.
8. Publication Categories:
   • There may be multiple publication-based award categories, such as Best Research Paper, Best Journal Article, Best Conference Presentation, etc., each with its specific criteria.

Publication-based awards serve as a way to acknowledge the critical role that research plays in advancing the field of Computational Biologists Awards. They motivate researchers to produce impactful work and contribute to the ongoing growth and development of the discipline.

Award 1: Research Excellence Award
Award 2: Young Scientist Award
Award 3: Best Researcher Award
Award 4: Outstanding Scientist Award
Award 5: Lifetime Achievement Award
Award 6: Women Researcher Award
Award 7: Best Faculty Award
Award 8: Best Scholar Award
Award 9: Excellence in Innovation Award
Award 10: Excellence in Research Award
Award 11: Best Extension Activity Award
Award 12: Best Keynote / Best Innovation Award
Award 13: Speaker Award
Award 14: Best Paper Award
Award 15: Most Cited Paper Award
Award 16: Best Committee Member Award
Award 17: Outstanding Contribution Award
Award 18: Innovative Research Award
Award 19: Distinguished Scientist Award
Award 20: Excellence in Research Award
Award 21: Pioneer Researcher Award
Award 22: Breakthrough Research Award
Award 23: Most Cited Researcher Award
Award 24: Best Academic Researcher Award
Award 25: Outstanding Educator Award
Award 26: Young Researcher Award
Award 27: Young Innovator Award
Award 28: Best Research Article Award
Award 29: Best Review Paper Award
Award 30: Most Cited Article Award
Award 31: Most Liked Article Award
Award 32: Most Shared Article Award
Award 33: Best Innovator Award
Award 34: Best Industrial Research Award
Award 35: Industry Impact Award
Award 36: Best Computational Biologist Award
Award 37: Bioinformatics Excellence Award
Award 38: Systems Biology Award
Award 39: Genomics Innovation Award
Award 40: Proteomics Research Award
Award 41: AI in Biology Award
Award 42: Data Science in Biology Award
Award 43: Computational Neuroscience Award
Award 44: Structural Bioinformatics Prize
Award 45: Evolutionary Bioinformatics Award
Award 46: Machine Learning in Biology Award
Award 47: Drug Discovery Award
Award 48: Omics Data Excellence Award
Award 49: Population Genetics Award
Award 50: Network Biology Prize
Award 51: Metagenomics Research Award
Award 52: Molecular Simulation Award
Award 53: Quantitative Biology Prize
Award 54: Single-Cell Analysis Award
Award 55: Computational Phylogenetics Prize
Award 56: Synthetic Biology Award
Award 57: Functional Genomics Award
Award 58: GWAS Research Excellence Award
Award 59: Computational Epigenetics Award
Award 60: Bioinformatics Algorithm Award
Award 61: Protein Structure Prediction Award
Award 62: Biological Imaging Award
Award 63: High-Throughput Sequencing Award
Award 64: Computational Immunology Prize
Award 65: Microbiome Data Award
Award 66: Translational Bioinformatics Award
Award 67: Cancer Genomics Prize
Award 68: Systems Medicine Award
Award 69: Computational Virology Award
Award 70: Digital Health Informatics Award
Award 71: Structural Systems Biology Award
Award 72: AI in Genomics Award
Award 73: Synthetic Biology Excellence Award
Award 74: Epigenomic Data Science Award
Award 75: Personalized Medicine Innovation Award

1. Research Excellence Award

Eligibility:

• Working professionals, researchers, or organizations may nominate deserving individuals.
• Nominees should have a strong track record of impactful research contributions.

Publication Required:

• Evidence of significant and well-recognized research achievements.
• Documented publications, collaborative projects, or impactful scientific outputs.

Additional Information:

• Honors individuals demonstrating outstanding research excellence, innovation, and influence.
• Recognizes established researchers whose work advances scientific progress.

2. Young Scientist Award

Eligibility:

• Nominees must be under 35 years of age on the conference date.

• Working professionals can nominate eligible individuals.

Publication Required:

• Demonstrated publication record in peer-reviewed journals or conference presentations.

Additional Information:

• Honors young researchers making significant contributions to their field.

• Often includes monetary prizes and networking opportunities.

• Application process and deadlines differ by provider.

3. Best Researcher Award

Eligibility:

• Open to researchers at any career stage with notable contributions.

Publication Required:

• Strong publication record in reputed peer-reviewed journals or conferences.

Additional Information:

• Recognizes outstanding research performance and impact.

• May include monetary awards, certificates, and career recognition.

• Application and evaluation criteria vary by provider.

4. Outstanding Scientist Award

Eligibility:

• Nominees must be under 55 years of age as of the conference date.

• Open to professionals and scientists with exceptional achievements.

Publication Required:

• Not always mandatory but a strong record supports the application.

Additional Information:

• Honors individuals for major scientific accomplishments and influence.

• Adds prestige and career advancement opportunities.

• Criteria and deadlines vary by organization.

5. Lifetime Achievement Award

Eligibility:

• Open to individuals with long-term, impactful contributions to their field.

Publication Required:

• Evidence of impactful publications or career achievements may be reviewed.

Additional Information:

• Celebrates a distinguished career and lasting influence.

• Often accompanied by recognition, awards ceremonies, and honorary titles.

• Application criteria vary by award provider.

6. Best Paper Award

Eligibility:

• Open to authors of exceptional research papers presented at conferences or published in journals.

Publication Required:

• A paper must be published or presented in a recognized peer-reviewed venue.

Additional Information:

• Awarded based on research quality, innovation, and field impact.

• Often includes certificates or monetary rewards.

• Selection criteria depend on the conference or journal.

7. Women Researcher Award

Eligibility:

• Open exclusively to female researchers at any career stage.

• Recognizes significant contributions to their discipline.

Publication Required:

• Strong publication record is advantageous.

Additional Information:

• Highlights the accomplishments of women in research.

• Includes recognition, professional visibility, and opportunities for collaboration.

• Criteria and deadlines vary.

8. Best Scholar Award

Eligibility:

• Open to scholars demonstrating exceptional academic performance and contributions.

Publication Required:

• Strong publication or conference presentation record preferred.

Additional Information:

• Recognizes scholarly excellence and academic impact.

• Often includes recognition, certificates, and prestige.

• Application processes vary by awarding body.

9. Excellence in Research Award

Eligibility:

• Open to individuals showing outstanding accomplishments and contributions to their field.

Publication Required:

• Strong evidence of publications in peer-reviewed journals or conferences is typically required.

Additional Information:

• Honors exceptional research achievements.

• Often includes recognition, professional advancement, and funding opportunities.

• Evaluation criteria differ by award provider.

• Subject Tracks
• Track 1: Bioinformatics
• Track 2: Systems Biology
• Track 3: Computational Genomics
• Track 4: Structural Bioinformatics
• Track 5: Evolutionary Bioinformatics
• Track 6: Computational Neuroscience
• Track 7: Omics Data Analysis
• Track 8: Machine Learning in Biology
• Track 9: AI in Drug Discovery
• Track 10: Computational Proteomics
• Track 11: Population Genetics Modeling
• Track 12: Network Biology
• Track 13: Metagenomics
• Track 14: Molecular Dynamics Simulations
• Track 15: Quantitative Biology
• Track 16: Biological Data Science
• Track 17: RNA-Seq Data Analysis
• Track 18: Single-Cell Computational Analysis
• Track 19: Computational Phylogenetics
• Track 20: Synthetic Biology Modeling
• Track 21: Functional Genomics
• Track 22: Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS)
• Track 23: Computational Epigenetics
• Track 24: Algorithm Development for Bioinformatics
• Track 25: Protein Structure Prediction
• Track 26: Biological Image Analysis
• Track 27: High-Throughput Sequencing Analysis
• Track 28: Computational Immunology
• Track 29: Microbiome Data Analysis
• Track 30: Translational Bioinformatics
• Track 31: Pharmacogenomics Modeling
• Track 32: Cancer Genomics Computational Studies
• Track 33: Computational Systems Medicine
• Track 34: Computational Virology
• Track 35: Digital Health and Computational Biology
• Track 36: Structural Systems Biology
• Track 37: Deep Learning for Genomics
• Track 38: Computational Synthetic Biology
• Track 39: Epigenomic Data Integration
• Track 40: AI in Personalized Medicine

1. Review the Award Categories:
   • Before submitting a nomination, carefully review the available award categories to ensure you are applying for the most suitable one that aligns with your work or contributions.
2. Read the Guidelines:
   • Familiarize yourself with the submission guidelines and eligibility criteria for the specific award category you intend to apply for.
3. Prepare a Strong Submission:
   • Craft a well-structured nomination that highlights the significance and impact of your contributions to the field of Computational Biologists Awards.
   • Clearly articulate the problem you addressed, the methodology you employed, and the results achieved.
4. Supporting Documentation:
   • Include any relevant supporting materials, such as research papers, project reports, or evidence of innovations, to strengthen your nomination.
5. Accuracy and Authenticity:
   • Ensure that all information provided in your nomination is accurate and authentic. Any attempt to provide false or misleading information may result in disqualification.
6. Publication-Based Awards (if applicable):
   • If you are submitting for a publication-based award, make sure the nominated publication(s) meet the specified criteria and are directly related to Computational Biologists Awards.
7. Contact Information:
   • Provide accurate contact information to ensure you can be reached for updates, notifications, and further communication related to your nomination.
8. Proofread and Edit:
   • Carefully proofread and edit your submission for clarity, coherence, and correctness. A well-presented nomination enhances your chances of being recognized.
9. Highlight Impact and Innovation:
   • Emphasize the real-world impact of your work and any innovative aspects that distinguish your contributions from others.
10. Recommendation Letters (if applicable):
    • If the nomination process requires recommendation letters or endorsements, ensure that they are provided by reputable sources who can speak to the quality and significance of your work.
11. Deadline Adherence:
    • Submit your nomination well before the deadline to avoid any last-minute technical issues or delays.
12. Professional Networking:
    • Consider networking with peers and experts in the field of International Computational Biologists Awards. Building professional relationships can lead to valuable endorsements and support for your nomination.
13. Award Ceremony Attendance (if applicable):
    • If you are selected as a winner, make plans to attend the award ceremony or event to receive your recognition and connect with fellow professionals in the field.
14. Learn from Past Winners:
    • Study the profiles and submissions of past award winners to understand what made their nominations successful.
15. Seek Feedback:
    • If your nomination is not successful, consider seeking feedback from the award organizers or evaluators to improve your future nominations.

DOWNLOAD APPLICATION FORM